Pages

Wednesday 1 September 2021

Is Kamil Az-Ziyarat reliable?


Sahib Kamil Az-Ziyarat writes:

We acknowledge that we cannot encompass everything which has been narrated from them about this topic (ziyarah) or about any other topic (for that matter).  Furthermore, I have only narrated that which was reported to me by the trustworthy ones from among our companions – may Allah’s Mercy be upon them – and I did not include anything which has been reported by unknown or unreliable sources who are not well-known for their knowledge and narrations.

📚Kamil Az-Ziyarat P19-20





Sahib Al-Wasail writes:

“And also Ja’far bin Muhammad bin Qulawayh has testified that the narrators of Kamil al-Ziyarat are reliable and trustworthy. His explicit statement in the beginning of Kamil al-Ziyarat is more expressive and frank than Ali bin Ibrahim’s (about authenticity of his book.”

📚Wasail-us-Shia V30,P202




 

Al Khoei declares cursing and insulting of Omaris as Wajib

Al Khoei writes:

What is meant by “believer” here is the one who believes in Allah and his messenger and the last day and the twelve Imams (as), starting with `Ali bin abi Talib (as) and ending with al-Qa’em al-Hujjah, the awaited one may Allah hasten his appearance and make us among his supporters, and he who denies one of them then it is allowed to backbite him for several reasons: 1- It has been proven in the narrations and Ziyarat and supplications that it is permissible to curse the ones who oppose us, and that it is obligatory to disown them, and increase their insults, and accuse them, and slander them, meaning to backbite them because they are from the people of innovation and doubt. There is no doubt about their Kufr, because denying al-Wilayah and the Imams (as) even if just one, and to believe in the Khilafah of others, and to believe in myths such as al-Jabr and other beliefs necessities Kufr and Zandaqah, as mentioned in the Mutawatir narrations that clearly demonstrate the Kufr of the rejector of al-Wilayah, and the Kufr of the one who believes in the mentioned beliefs and similar other misguided beliefs.

📚Misbahul Fuqaha V1 P503-504



 

Teacher of Taqi Majlisi(rh) does an open takfir on Aisha

Shaikh Muhammad Tahir Al Qumi ash-Shirazi(rh) writes:

What has been reported on the shortcomings of the enemies of Ahlulbayt (as) that evidences upon the Imamah of our twelve Imams (as) is that Aisha is a kafirah deserving of hellfire. It is a necessity of the reality of our religion and the reality of our twelve Imams (as), because all those who profess by the caliphate of the three (Abu Bakr, Umar and Uthman) believes that she was a believer and honors and respects her, while all those who profess by Imamate of the twelve Imams (a.s) profess by her being deserving of la’nah and Allah (swt)’s punishment. So when her being like that is established, the point is proven, because no one claims a separation (of Aisha from the issue).

As for the evidence of her being deserving of la’nah and Allah (swt)’s punishment, so indeed she waged war against Imam Ali (as) and there are mutawatir ahadith from the Prophet (saw) said “one who wars against you (i.e. Imam Ali) wars against me.”, and there is no doubt warring against the Prophet (saw) is kufr.

📚Al-Arbaain fi Imamati Al-Aimmati At-tahirina P615-616




 

Does Mufid(rh) reject Ilm Al-Ghayb?

Question: One individual who possesses  extreme views claimed that Shaykh Al Mufid(rh) was a Muqassir and denier of virtues of Ahlul Bayt(a...